Two methods for percent cover monitoring

Mark_Brandenburg at millerlegg.com Mark_Brandenburg at millerlegg.com
Thu Oct 25 08:10:24 EDT 2001




Victor,

Dodge, et. al. provide a comparison of several assessment methods in:

Dodge, R.E., A. Logan, and A. Antonius. 1982. Quantitative reef assessment
studies in Bermuda: a comparison of methods and preliminary results.
Bulletin of Marine Science 32(3): 745-760

Mark E. Brandenburg, M.S., C.E.
Biologist
Miller Legg & Associates, Inc.
1800 N. Douglas Road, Suite 200
Pembroke Pines, FL 33024-3200
954-436-7000 fax 954-436-8664
mbrandenburg at millerlegg.com





"Gomelyuk, Victor" <victor.gomelyuk at PLMBAY.PWCNT.NT.GOV.AU> on 10/23/2001
08:51:04 AM



 To:      coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov                      

 cc:      (bcc: Mark Brandenburg/MILEG)                       



 Subject: Two methods for percent cover monitoring            







Dear colleagues,
I wonder if anyone would like to share with me and other coral-list
memebers
ideas of advantages/disadvantages of using Line Intercept Transects and
Permanent Quadrats methods for coral environment monitoring. Refferences on
any literarure sources will be also appreciated.
Thank you.
Dr Victor E. Gomelyuk
Marine Scientist
Cobourg Marine Park
PO Box 496 PALMERSTON NT 0831 AUSTRALIA
phone 61 (08) 8979 0244
FAX 61 (08) 8979 0246

~~~~~~~
For directions on subscribing and unsubscribing to coral-list or the
digests, please visit www.coral.noaa.gov, click on Popular on the
menu bar, then click on Coral-List Listserver.




~~~~~~~
For directions on subscribing and unsubscribing to coral-list or the
digests, please visit www.coral.noaa.gov, click on Popular on the
menu bar, then click on Coral-List Listserver.



More information about the Coral-list-old mailing list