[Coral-List] banning wild collection when mariculture sources exist [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Margie.Atkinson at gbrmpa.gov.au
Fri Feb 29 00:44:39 EST 2008
I agree - my personal view is that the key word in this entire debate is
"sustainable". From a conservation point of view it should be prefixed
by the word "ecologically" sustainable. The trick is definitely in
getting the triple bottom line-balance sorted, to foster stewardship. I
would be keen to see some more dialogue about other people's efforts to
resolve this one.
Fisheries Issues Group
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
2-68 Flinders St
PO Box 1379
Townsville, Qld 4810
Ph: (07) 4750 0735
(intl. +61 7 4750 0735)
Fax: (07) 4772 6093
(intl. +61 7 4772 6093)
mobile: 0438 387 303
Email: margiea at gbrmpa.gov.au
Proudly supporting International Year of the Reef (IYOR 2008)
If you have received this transmission in error please notify us immediately
by return email and delete all copies. Any unauthorised use, disclosure or
distribution of this email is prohibited.
INTERNAL NOTE: This email could be a Commonwealth Record.
Please place a copy of this email on the relevant file in
circumstances where action is required, a decision has
been made, or a direction has been given. Records
Management can provide more guidance on the capture of
email as records within the GBRMPA.
Les Kaufman wrote, On 29/02/2008 14:18:
> Dear Todd,
> Re: your comment (below), things are not so simple.
> Sustainable collection of some aquarium species still represents a
> great potential for marine conservation by
> fueling one part of the incentive structure.
> Just because this potential is so often perverted doesn't mean it
> couldn't happen.
> We need experience in striking a balance in natural-products
> businesses that is most beneficial to long-term sustainability of
> coral reef systems in proximity to people.
> This answer is quite simple and our Foundation has been advocating it
> years. All countries should ban any aquarium species that can be
> demonstrated to be aquacultured by 3 or more private interests.
> This way, there would be no competition for raised (fish or corals) from
> wild sources so the market would develop a fair price. A great
> example is
> the "Nemo" fish (clown fishes)....all can be fully reared in
> captivity but
> wild sources still account for the bulk of the market...why? It is
> to pay 10 cents for collection and a buck to ship it even if 10% die in
> shipping than to raise a fish that costs $5 bucks in food and
> Les Kaufman
> Professor of Biology
> Boston University Marine Program
> Senior PI
> Marine Management Area Science
> Conservation International
> “I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully.”
> George W. Bush
> Saginaw, Michigan; September 29, 2000
> Coral-List mailing list
> Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
More information about the Coral-List