[Coral-List] Need for more oil

[Quenton Dokken]

Strong commentary Gene.  We must also deal with the issue of visual
pollution by wind turbines and space allocations for solar.  We seem to be
caught between a rock and a hard place.

Quenton

Quenton Dokken, Ph.D.
Executive Director
Gulf of Mexico Foundation, Inc.
PMB 51 5403 Everhart Rd.
Corpus Christi, TX 78411

Office:  3833 South Staples Suite S214
                Corpus Christi, TX 78411

361-882-3939 o
361-882-1262 f
361-442-6064 c

www.gulfmex.org

-----Original Message-----
From: coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
[mailto:coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov] On Behalf Of Eugene Shinn
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:01 AM
To: coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
Subject: [Coral-List] Need for more oil

>Dear Listers who wish to end oil use.  An interesting article  was 
>published recently in the NYTimes titled  "A Bad Bet On Carbon." The 
>article lists a number of problems with Co2 sequestration but the 
>significant one had to do with scale. Here is the direct quote. 
>"The third, and most vexing, problem has to do with scale. In 2009, 
>carbon dioxide emissions in the United States totaled 5.4 billion 
>tons. Lets assume that policymakers want to use carbon capture to 
>get rid of half of those emissions---say 3 billion tons per year. 
>That works out to about 8.2 million tons of carbon dioxide per day, 
>which would have to be collected and compressed to about 1,000 psi 
>(that compressed volume of carbon dioxide would be roughly 
>equivalent to the volume of daily global oil production).
>    In other words, we would need to find an underground location (or 
>locations) able to swallow a volume equal to the contents of 41 oil 
>supertankers each day, 365 days a year."
>     The rest of the article is about the 23,000 miles of new 
>pipeline needed and the social problems with property rights and the 
>25% reduced output of power plants due to carbon capture.

Any thinking person can see this is a near impossible task in the 
near term even if the figure is cut in half. Many look to France for 
Co2 reduction where its no secret that they do it using nuclear 
energy and reprocess the waste. They even export some electricity to 
other European nations.  If you believe Co2 is a real problem for 
corals and want to reduce oil use we should do what the French did. 
That way we can remain productive and not depend on foreign sources 
of goods such as the computers on which we write these messages. Gene

>



>Gene

-- 


No Rocks, No Water, No Ecosystem (EAS)
------------------------------------ -----------------------------------
E. A. Shinn, Courtesy Professor
University of South Florida
Marine Science Center (room 204)
140 Seventh Avenue South
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
<eshinn at marine.usf.edu>
Tel 727 553-1158---------------------------------- 
-----------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list