[Coral-List] The battle for biodiversity
Martin Moe
martin_moe at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 29 09:35:33 EST 2010
The Battle for Biodiversity
For hundreds of years, and into this century as well, we have selectively
exploited the resources of our marine environment striving only for
“sustainability”. And of course, to our simplistic and materialistic economic
philosophy, “sustainability” means to take every individual from every valuable
species that it is possible to take within the expectation that there will be
enough individuals remaining to assure that the same amount can be taken the
next year. And that, of course, is, or was, the philosophy of those concerned
about the maintaining an exploitable future for the resource. Those interested
only in the short term economic gain of unrestricted exploitation without
concern for the future of the resource, the environment, or the cooperative
human investment in the health of the resource, ignore and circumvent whenever
possible any conservation efforts that may be imposed to protect the resource.
My concern though, is not with the “outlaws”, but with the prevailing approach
to conservation of valuable species. In essentially all instances, the value of
biodiversity in not considered. The concept of protecting biodiversity in order
to sustain a healthy ecosystem is a relatively new and not well accepted concept
by most who rest their living from the resources of the sea.
A case in point is the spiny lobster fishery of Florida. It has been shown
through analysis of mitochondrial DNA (Silberman, et. al., 1994) that, as
expected, genetic analysis shows no evidence of genetic structure in the spiny
lobster (P. argus) population, which is consistent with a high gene flow
throughout the population. This also indicates that the population of spiny
lobsters in Florida is dependent on larval influx from Caribbean sources.
The response of Florida fishermen to the NOAA effort to utilize catch shares, a
method of regulating the total catch of a species to protect both the species
and their place in the ecosystem reflects the inevitable “tragedy of the
commons” result of economic based fishery management. The response of the
Florida Keys Commercial Fisherman’s Association to the status of the spiny
lobster population in the Keys is “We fishermen believe that in essence, we
could harvest every legal size, non-egg bearing lobster in Florida, and it would
make no difference to how many lobster we catch next year.” Which may be true,
and which makes sense within the age old concept of exploitation to very limit
of all economically valuable marine species, but it fails to recognize the great
damage this mindset does to the ecological health of marine environments.
Spiny lobsters are, or were, an important cog in the ecology of Florida coral
reefs and they are now, because of fishery exploitation, essentially no longer
ecologically functional on these reefs, or in the nursery areas of Florida Bay.
Marine Protected Areas are very important to the maintenance of essential
biodiversity in marine environments. But in the long run, unless the areas
protected are very great, that may not be a functional method to repair general
biodiversity. We are facing a crisis brought on by our exploitation of all the
resources of the earth, living and fossil, and the only real answers are
population control and development of a universal human mind set of ecological
preservation that controls all exploitation, placing the health of the
environment before the demands of economic and recreational exploitation. And
how can we accomplish that?
Martin Moe
More information about the Coral-List
mailing list