[Coral-List] NOAA Finds 66 Corals Warrant Listing under the US Endangered Species Act
Dean Jacobson
atolldino at yahoo.com
Wed Dec 5 16:53:59 EST 2012
Eugene:
Out here in the remote Western Pacific, I can relate with your concern.
* Coral mortality is localized to overpopulated areas, healthy everywhere else
* Some of these coral are abundant
* Global impacts (temperature, pH) do not yet seem apparent (at least in the RMI)
However, that said, it is not wise to wait until the demise of most reefs to start raising the alarm. This is clearly a bit of PR on the part of the Center for Biological Diveristy (good PR, I think), to try to increase the profile, the conversation about the ongoing/upcoming global biodiversity crisis. We are in this for the long-haul, many centuries (we do not have a war against Christmas, but we do have a war against nature!). It is wise to try to save what we can, to think very, very long term. For humans, thinking longterm seems to be about as easy as a dog riding a bicycle. Geologists get this, but some do not seem to be particularly concerned about unnecessary mass extinctions. We need to be thinking more like naturalists, less like engineers or economists, IMHO.
Cheers,
Dean
From: Eugene Shinn <eshinn at marine.usf.edu>
To: coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2012 7:08 AM
Subject: [Coral-List] NOAA Finds 66 Corals Warrant Listing under the US Endangered Species Act
Dear Coral-Listers, I am still waiting for someone to explain how
listing 66 coral species and elevating Acropora sp to endangered
status is going to enhance their growth. We can only hope that
listing may open taxpayer's pocket books to accomplish research aimed
at discovering exactly what ails these corals. But, will listing fix
the problem if the cause is discovered? Such research may take place
if researchers have the time and patience to obtain the necessary
research permits. Some excellent fieldwork has already suggested
genomic effects allow certain individuals to thrive. In other words
the strong will survive. Warming seas of course is one of the usual
suspects but unfortunately listing will not solve that problem.
We should all commend those who have made important discoveries
already by transplanting hardy individuals to special underwater
racks and clotheslines. These are important
discoveries/demonstrations that indicate hardy individuals will
eventually repopulate the reefs as they have done repeatedly during
the past 6.000 years. An interesting and surprising outcome of these
coral garden experiments is accelerated growth even while growing in
the same water that was supposed to be killing them. Listing clearly
will not change that. We should be thankful that most species, at
least in the Atlantic, are already protected from physical abuse in a
number of sanctuaries and MPAs. The question we should ask is, will
adding another layer of expensive tax-supported government
bureaucracy and specialized lawyers be helpful? Will another layer of
government bureaucracy that cannot save these corals keep us from
going over the fiscal cliff? Yes, there will be 18 public hearings.
How much that will cost? In my experience these hearing exercises
are a form of group therapy that simply softens the blow of larger
expenses that follow. I guess what will be will be. It is a done
deal like it or not. Gene
--
No Rocks, No Water, No Ecosystem (EAS)
------------------------------------ -----------------------------------
E. A. Shinn, Courtesy Professor
University of South Florida
College of Marine Science Room 221A
140 Seventh Avenue South
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
<eshinn at marine.usf.edu>
Tel 727 553-1158----------------------------------
-----------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
More information about the Coral-List
mailing list