[Coral-List] Science and advocacy

Reese, Jessica Jessica.Reese at CZS.org
Thu Jul 19 10:47:09 EDT 2012


While I was reading the newest Six Americas study last night, this
jumped out at me: 

"If 90 percent of climate scientists were to state publicly that global
warming is happening, 66 percent of the Concerned, 58 percent of the
Alarmed, and 48 percent of the Cautious say that it would increase their
level of concern about the issue. Only 18 percent of the Dismissive,
however, say their concern would increase, consistent with their
distrust of climate scientists."

The questions that were posed in this latest study are probing, and the
results are illuminating. A pdf of the report can be obtained here:
http://environment.yale.edu/climate/publications/Six-Americas-March-2012
/


I do believe that the coral scientist consensus is the exact thing that
our world needs right now, in order to proceed toward a sustainable
outcome. I applaud those scientists who have signed and are making their
voice heard.

Peace,
Jess Reese
Not-a-coral-scientist-just-a-passionate-coral-advocate

-----Original Message-----
From: coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
[mailto:coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov] On Behalf Of Julian @
Reef Check
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:05 PM
To: 'Steve Mussman'; coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
Subject: Re: [Coral-List] Science and advocacy

At the risk of being unscientific...maybe the Coral List shouldn't be
involved in advocacy.

Perhaps I need to understand better where the science ends and advocacy
begins, because maybe these are two separate functions. Yes, successful
advocacy needs to be based on good science...but it needs more social
and
socio-economic skills to be effective. The people living on our islands
don't begin to understand the science behind resilience, for
example...but
they can be educated to understand the need to close areas of reef to
protect future fish stocks. 

In a recent post, Doug Fenner ended with the following statement: 

"I submit that we have NO choice but to save the coral reefs, and in
fact
humanity can do it, if it decides to."

The whole problem is that our political leaders probably WON'T decide to
do
it, or at the least will continue to prevaricate until it is too late
(Rio+20?). Science might tell us we could and should, but science isn't
advocacy, and that is where we are failing.

Julian Hyde
General Manager
Reef Check Malaysia Bhd
03 2161 5948
www.reefcheck.org.my
Follow us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/rcmalaysia

"The bottom line of the Millenium Assessment findings is that human
actions
are depleting Earth's natural capital, putting such strain on the
environment that the ability of the planet's ecosystems to sustain
future
generations can no longer be taken for granted."

-----Original Message-----
From: coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
[mailto:coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov] On Behalf Of Steve
Mussman
Sent: Thursday, 19 July, 2012 2:03 AM
To: coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
Subject: [Coral-List] Science and advocacy

Coral-List is hardly a forum of advocacy. As a outside observer, I have
often been frustrated by the lack of assertiveness exhibited by the
scientific community in confronting the clear and distinct issues
threatening coral reef systems around the world. From my perspective,
the
fact that some find recently posted comments too subjective is somewhat
encouraging.

  Regards,
   Steve
-----Original Message-----
>From: Jim Hendee <jim.hendee at noaa.gov>
>Sent: Jul 18, 2012 11:38 AM
>To: Eugene Shinn <eshinn at marine.usf.edu>
>Cc: coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
>Subject: Re: [Coral-List] Science and advocacy
>
>Just so everybody's clear on this, Coral-List is managed by the 
>National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the U.S. Department
of
Commerce.
>As the Administrator of Coral-List (along with my Team Members Lew 
>Gramer and Mike Jankulak), I can assure all 6,988 subscribers to 
>Coral-List that we try to be as even-handed as possible, and follow the

>posted rules and guidelines of Coral-List, without any influence 
>whatsoever from any "advocacy group."  We are extremely judicious and 
>fair in reviewing all comments that go out, even when they poke an eye
in
Coral-List!
>
>Sincerely yours,
>   Jim
>
>On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Eugene Shinn
<eshinn at marine.usf.edu>wrote:
>
>> Thank you Christopher Hawkins. We share the same concerns. I have 
>> stood by and watched as the coral-list was taken over by advocacy 
>> groups. Gene
>> --
>>
>>
>> No Rocks, No Water, No Ecosystem (EAS)
>> ------------------------------------ 
>> -----------------------------------
>> E. A. Shinn, Courtesy Professor
>> University of South Florida
>> College of Marine Science Room 221A
>> 140 Seventh Avenue South
>> St. Petersburg, FL 33701
>> <eshinn at marine.usf.edu>
>> Tel 727 553-1158----------------------------------
>> -----------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Coral-List mailing list
>> Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
>> http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Coral-List mailing list
>Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
>http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list

_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list


_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list


More information about the Coral-List mailing list