[Coral-List] CO2 risks for coral reefs
Steve Mussman
sealab at earthlink.net
Tue Aug 25 15:54:30 EDT 2015
Accepting the status quo and continuing to manage coral reefs as best we can
is only acceptable if one finds it satisfactory to do nothing when
confronted with a confirmable and transcendent crisis. At the moment there
still seems to be cause for hope, but time is running out. I don't see how
people of conscience have any choice but to advocate for a comprehensive and
proactive approach as Peter suggests. We can all come up with reasons to
doubt and question the current level of national and international will to
take on this challenge, but that in no way justifies inaction or
indifference.
-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter Sale
>Sent: Aug 21, 2015 12:24 PM
>To: "eugeneshinn at mail.usf.edu" , "coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov"
>Subject: [Coral-List] CO2 risks for coral reefs
>
>Gene,
>Agree with the sentiment, but disagree slightly on the details of what you
said. 1) Yes, it will take time, but we can be passive and see a
long-drawn-out shift away from fossil fuels, or we can be more pro-active
and achieve the shift much more rapidly - second is clearly preferable if we
want to minimize damage to the oceans, and 2) as well as
reducing/eliminating CO2 emissions, we can maximize rates at which CO2 is
taken out of the atmosphere by encouraging reforestation and afforestation,
encouraging no-till farming practices and use of perennial rather than
annual crops, and by developing technologies for sequestering CO2, CH4
preferably in solid materials, either capturing the gases at source, or
extracting them from the atmosphere. The new technologies would increase the
rate at which we pull atmospheric concentrations back, thereby getting reefs
and oceans back to a less damaging place.
>
>In other words, we can be more proactive in reducing damage to reefs and
oceans from warming and acidification. If we do this, and also act to
actually manage the local pressures of overfishing and pollution, we bring
reefs through this tight spot relatively unscathed. If we go forward as we
currently are doing, making minimal efforts to reduce GHG emissions, reefs
disappear, and the oceans are seriously acidified, both to the detriment of
humanity because we need the goods and services they provide us.
>
>Main effort at present should be to push, in advance of Paris talks, for
CO2 less than 350ppm - a much more demanding target than the 2 degree limit
set at Copenhagen.
>
>Peter Sale
>_______________________________________________
>Coral-List mailing list
>Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
>http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
More information about the Coral-List
mailing list