[Coral-List] Is any reef "remote?"
Thomas Mario DeCarlo
tdecarlo at mit.edu
Wed May 17 19:38:15 EDT 2017
Perhaps it's semantics, but it seems to me that many coral reefs can be considered "remote", as in difficult to access or far away from the population centers. Of course remote coral reefs can still be "impacted" (or even covered with rubbish!) and "remote" is certainly not synonymous with "pristine". But when considering local vs global impacts on coral reefs I think there is at least some utility in the word "remote", even if it is subjective.
From: coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov [coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml..noaa.gov] on behalf of Risk, Michael [riskmj at mcmaster.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 9:15 AM
To: coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
Subject: [Coral-List] Is any reef "remote?"
For those of you who may still harbour the belief that there are reefs
isolated from human impacts:
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
More information about the Coral-List