[Coral-List] CO2 science
kleypas at ucar.edu
Fri Oct 30 14:00:08 EDT 2009
Bill Allison recently asked this:
I wonder what the authors cited in Sherwood and Isdo 2009 would have to say
about that document
Regarding a recent post Eugene Shinn:
> John ,That is a great post! Thanks for making me (and listers) aware
> of the Co2science website. I was especially impressed with
> http://www.co2science.org/articles/V12/N21/EDIT.php. Amazing example
> of how the published results of our well respected coral scientists
> can support an alternative interpretation of the effects of co2 on
> corals. Keith and Idso wrote a very scholarly piece and came up with
> a very different perception. Gene
Here is what I have to say:
Walter Goldberg's post captured the problem with th reports. CO2science
is cherry-picking science to support the point they want to make. They
are not objective. In previous ocean acidification publications, we've
specifically addressed their contrarian points head on (e.g., the fact
that we had corals in the past when CO2 levels were high; the flawed
argument that CO2 increase will fertilize zooxanthellae production and
thus enhance calcification). The authors then cite those publications
to make a point, yet blatantly ignore the explanations provided in the
same publications that prove their points wrong.
Unfortunately, their reports do make it into the hands of US
Congressmen, and provide fodder for the naysayers as well as confusion
for those who are honestly trying to understand the science. We do have
our peer review process in science, which is not perfect, but it does
help keep us honest. Yes, sometimes good science is unfairly quashed by
this process, but even so, these guys don't even try to have their work
peer reviewed by experts in the field.
This has been going on since about 2000 and to address these folks head
on is a waste of time - they don't come to the discussion with a quest
for the truth, but rather with a quest to "win" the conversation. I
don't even like posting my comments on this issue, because invariably
someone will see it as an 'opening' for a useless debate. It doesn't
matter how much information one provides them, it would not change what
they say. Their audience is not us, nor do they feel the need to prove
anything to us.
all the best,
Walter Goldberg wrote:
> I took a look at the essay written by "CO2science" posted recently. They make some interesting points about CO2 and corals, some of which are actually fact-based. Regrettably, their perspective is so biased that the authors seem to highlight only the parts of papers they like. For example, they cite Maynard et al., 2008 (Major bleaching events can lead to increased thermal tolerance in corals. Marine Biology (Berlin) 155: 173-182) as follows: “Major bleaching events can lead to increased thermal tolerance in corals” and the coral genera that were originally most susceptible to thermal stress (Pocillopora and Acropora) "showed the greatest increase in tolerance." Both of these statements may be true, but here is the part they left out:
> Although the vulnerability of coral reefs remains largely dependent on the rate and extent of climate change, such increase in thermal tolerance may delay the onset of mass coral mortalities in time for the implementation of low-emission scenarios and effective management”.
> This is in the abstract, so it doesn’t take much sleuthing or scholarship (as Gene calls it) to figure out what these guys are trying to do. Who or what is CO2science? It is The Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change run by the Idso family who constitute the Chairman, President, Vice President and Operations Manager. Three have PhD’s, none having anything to do with reefs or oceans. Here are some gems from their own website:
> 1) Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming
> Where We Stand on the Issue
> C. D. Idso and K. E. Idso
> ….the biospheric benefits that come from the aerial fertilization effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment: enhanced plant growth, increased plant water use efficiency, greater food production for both people and animals, plus a host of other biological benefits too numerous to describe..
> 2) What Motivates the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change?
> “ExxonMobil made some donations to us a few times in the past”. “We never discuss our funding”.
> My goodness, nothing suspicious here. Just pure scholarship.
> Walter M. Goldberg, Ph.D.
> Professor of Biological Sciences
> Florida International University
> University Park Campus
> Miami, FL 33199
> email goldberg at fiu.edu
> Coral-List mailing list
> Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
Integrated Science Program / Climate & Global Dynamics
National Center for Atmospheric Research
PO Box 3000
Boulder, CO 80307-3000
kleypas at ucar.edu
More information about the Coral-List