[Coral-List] Imperfect helpful 60 Minutes
spalumbi at stanford.edu
Tue Dec 20 11:23:51 EST 2011
Steve's query and John Bruno's blog - along with Randy Olsen's critique
and various replies - have underplayed the value of the 60 Minutes
piece. Millions of people who only get their information from television
sets now have an impression that somebody found a reef worth fighting
for and that there is some hope for it because of local protection, a
reduction in fishing and the abundance of wildlife. I agree with Randy
that this was tedious story telling - but my Dad watched it and wanted
to know if it was true. And he didn't want to know if coral cover had
increased over the Caribbean average (as he would have if this was a
stock transaction and the stock didn't meet S&P standards). He basically
wanted to know if there was any hope for this one tiny bit of live rock
in a place he will never go. Then there was another football game coming
on, and whatever impact 60 Min had had was finished.
Since that is over now, our question to ourselves is how we take
advantage of such an opportunity. Telling better stores (certainly).
Figuring out if local protections are helping (obviously). Helping turn
the world away from a CO2 addiction (long term). Figuring out the
nuances of impacts of multiple stressors on reefs and how corals respond
and adapt to them (yes, but these are jobs we do among ourselves to
produce understanding and maybe hopefully to produce sustainability
tools). But mostly we have in our power to open up the gates and show
people all over the world the beauty and power of wild and healthy reefs
where ever we manage to find them, and build an emotional connection to
protecting the world's life.
So if Anderson Cooper ever calls you to go on another reef trip, please
take him along, and do another one of these imperfect, helpful pieces.
On 12/19/11 12:09 PM, Steve Mussman wrote:
> The 60 Minute piece on the state of coral reef ecology served as an
> excellent primer which should help to increase public awareness and
> hopefully lead to more efforts aimed at gaining traction on this issue.
> At the same time, the segment raised some interesting questions.
> I would like to know how coral-list subscribers react to some of the
> statistics and assertions cited. (Ex. 90% of sharks are gone and 25%
> of reefs have been lost with another 25% likely to disappear in the
> next two decades).
> And what about the ability of healthy reefs to resist the multiple stresses
> associated with development, tourism and rising atmospheric CO2 levels?
> This of course leads right to the topic of sustainable tourism. The reef
> featured was in a remote area fifty miles south of the main island of Cuba.
> Development and tourism is so highly restricted there that it would be
> unrealistic to expect that such standards could ever be applied to reefs
> located in the more popular tourist-driven dive destinations. While I
> that all sustainability efforts are helpful, I question whether or not these
> can ever measure up and offset the greater forces at play.
> Certainly "healthy', well-protected reefs such as The Gardens of the Queen
> will be better equipped to withstand the onslaught, but if we don't
> deal with climate change and ocean temperatures continue to rise (along with
> associated trends in acidification), can there be any real hope that even
> relatively pristine reefs won't ultimately share the same fate as their less
> resistant counterparts?
> Coral-List mailing list
> Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
More information about the Coral-List