[Coral-List] 82 coral species listing
Pedro H. Rodríguez
phernanrod at yahoo.com
Wed Jul 11 10:33:12 EDT 2012
Gene,
Do you reckon that the health of those corals be worse off with their listing? Unfortunately, crystal balls were not available in the 70s and 80s, and so it is hard to know what would have happened, but in all likelihood (1) nothing bad for the corals, (2) something good by increased public perception on something being wrong in the ECOSYSTEM, and (3) something very good as pressure would have been applied to government agencies to look for root causes (including the spraying of mosquitoes, which seems to be your favorite but unconfirmed pet peeve). Am I missing something important from your insistent criticism?
Pedro
________________________________
From: Gene Shinn <eshinn at marine.usf.edu>
To: coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 3:21 PM
Subject: [Coral-List] 82 coral species listing
I am sitting on my boat in Marathon Florida Having just completed
photographing my two main serial photography sites. One at Carysfort
reef and one at Grecian rocks reef. The series is now 52 years in
length. You can view the first 50 years of this series at the USGS
website.
What does the series show? The advent of coral diseases in the late
1970s and the demise of Acropora cervicornis that culminated in 1983
throughout the Caribbean. Decline due to bleaching and disease has
continued to the present. At both study sites which were once lush
there is no longer any A. cervicornis. I found one small sickly
colony about the size of a grapefruit at Grecian Rocks. I have to ask
the question. Had Acropora been listed back in 1984 when it was
apparent to all that the species was in a spiraling decline would it...
More information about the Coral-List
mailing list