[Coral-List] NYT Article on "Predatory Open-Access Journals"

RainbowWarriorsInternational southern_caribbean at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 26 11:30:45 EDT 2013

No all open access journals are out there to make a fast buck. My organization is part of a group that actually wants to create an avenue of peer-reviewed open access journals for sustainable development issues accessible in as many languages as possible and with no cost to publish.

Sounds impossible? Not really, the key is the "central registry" of intellectual property. I will not give away the business model for now, but it will work.

Indeed the big problem is the "quality" of scientific publications, which traditional and expensive peer-reviewed journal publishers will be quick to tell is only guaranteed using their business models.

There is no benchmarking for quality of science nor is there an ISO norm for conducting science? Doesn't the latter strike anyone as odd, that there are quality standards for virtually all human economic and social activities except scientific research (and religion)? 

We are in the process of preparing a position paper to send to the ISO to point out that the exercise of scientific research needs a map of ISO norms for all component activities and a framework quality standard for scientific research as a whole.

In this process librarians will play a key role because they deal with all activities related to scientific research in terms of information and data storage, retrieval, access, query and processing, categorization, meta data, data mining etc.

Only in the practice of religion can we accept things on faith alone, every other human activity if it can be monetized, can be subjected to quality standards.

Science should be no exception.

Milton Ponson, President
Rainbow Warriors Core Foundation
(Rainbow Warriors International)
Tel. +297 568 5908
PO Box 1154, Oranjestad 
Aruba, Dutch Caribbean 
Email: southern_caribbean at yahoo.com

To unite humanity in a global society dedicated to a sustainable way of life

 From: Héctor Reyes Bonilla <hreyes at uabcs.mx>
To: Magnus Johnson <m.johnson at hull.ac.uk> 
Cc: "coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov" <coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov> 
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Coral-List] NYT Article on "Predatory Open-Access Journals"

Coral list, saludos.

With all this situation of the "predatory journals", I believe that the
point is being missed, and that some perspective is needed..

The problem here is not if open access is good in itself or beneficial to
scientists in developing countries, nor if the new electronic
journals should have a place in the world to exist. The thing is that
science needs (begs for...) quality. The only reason science has been
probably the most successful collective enterprise in human history is that
not everything is taken as is. We need proof, evidence, and from that point
on we move on. Each and every day when all of us turn on a light or a
computer or a tv, and the machine starts, we can see how efficient science
is. When the quality goes down, everything goes down.

The new open access "journals" are not looking for a better world for
everyone, or to open lines for third world academics to flourish. The
editors just want to make a quick buck, either fooling young scientists (I
sincerely do not believe that a seasoned researcher is unaware of which are
the "good journals" and which ones not), or (the worst case) play to the
need to improve our income. Most people in the developed world do not know
that scientists in many countries in Latin America or Asia are rated
annualy by government agencies depeding basically on the number of
"international" papers that we produce. If you pass, you receive a monthly
stipend of about 1,000 to 2,500 USD, which practically doubles your salary.

Before the "predatory journals", one had to do adequate research in order
to get published in good journals (basically, those in ISI or other similar
companies). Now, as the government "referees" simply do not know the
quality of the journals (they are NOT scientists), if the paper is written
in English or in a journal with a title in English, it is valued equally as
if it appears in Nature, MEPS or whatever (I am exaggerating, but
unfortunately, just a little bit....). What is happening? Suddenly, many
people who has never won a competitive grant in their life and does field
work or experiments using a 6,000 USD yearly support of their institutions,
is publishing more papers and earning better salaries, jubilation money and
climbing faster in the academic ladder than those trying to obtain
resources from each country´s science agency (equivalent to the NSF).

In short, maybe in developed countries the new open access journals can be
seen with some sympathy as they do not seem to hurt anyone, but here in the
south, things are quite different...

¡Saludos a todos!

Hector Reyes

2013/4/25 Magnus Johnson <m.johnson at hull.ac.uk>

> I agree - both have their place.  I subscribe and edit for the wonderful
> Journal of Crustacean Biology (
> http://thecrustaceansociety.org/Jrl-Crustacean-Biology.html) and value
> the fact it groups papers together around a theme and encourages me to read
> stuff I might not stumble upon otherwise.  I've also recently started
> editing for PeerJ, an exciting new OpenAccess venture (https://peerj.com/
> ).
> I like both because they promote access to more people through discounts
> for those from developing nations or self funded graduate students and the
> latter allows anyone to view its contents.  I would think this is
> particularly important for tropical research.
> I used to depend upon MEPS, a traditional journal for much of my
> information but my university doesn't subscribe to the most up to date
> volumes because it is so expensive.  I have to access it by writing
> directly to authors.  That fact dissuades me from publishing in it.
> Cheers, Magnus
> ____________________________________________________
> Dr Magnus Johnson
> Centre for Environmental and Marine Sciences
> School of Biological, Biomedical and Environmental Sciences University of
> Hull
> http://www.marine-biology.org.uk/
> Associate Editor, Journal of Crustacean Biology,
> http://www.thecrustaceansociety.org
> Editor: Johnson M & Johnson M (2013) The Ecology and Biology of Nephrops
> norvegicus (Adv. Mar. Biol.)
> Nephrops project: www.nephrops.eu
> **************************************************
> To view the terms under which this email is
> distributed, please go to
> http://www2.hull.ac.uk/legal/disclaimer.aspx
> **************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Coral-List mailing list
> Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
> http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list

Héctor Reyes Bonilla
Departamento Académico de Biología Marina
Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur
Carretera al sur km 5.5. Col. El Calandrio
La Paz, B.C.S., C.P. 23080.
Tel. (52-612) 123-8800, ext. 4160
Fax (52-612) 123-8819.
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov

More information about the Coral-List mailing list