[Coral-List] Shark Feeding Question
Delbeek, Charles
CDelbeek at calacademy.org
Thu Feb 13 12:27:31 EST 2014
I would think it depends on the context under which the feeding is taking place. For example, feeding hotdogs or trout chow to reef fish would be different to feeding natural prey items to sharks.
On Oahu, The Hanauma Bay marine preserve used to allow feeding of fish, eventually since most people were feeding bread they began to actively sell packets of pellet food for this purpose. As a result large more aggressive fishes began to displace the smaller, less aggressive ones. I think there was also an impact on algal growth in the inner part of the bay but I may be making that up. Someone more familiar with the history of this can correct me if I am wrong. Once the feeding was banned the fish assemblage eventually returned to a more "normal" balance of species.
J. Charles Delbeek, M.Sc.
Assistant Curator, Steinhart Aquarium
California Academy of Sciences
Desk: 415.379.5303
Cell: 415.859.0420
Fax: 415.379.5304
cdelbeek at calacademy.org
www.calacademy.org
55 Music Concourse Dr.
Golden Gate Park
San Francisco CA 94118
What you can't see will amaze you. Dark Universe, a new planetarium show, now playing at the California Academy of Sciences.
-----Original Message-----
From: coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov [mailto:coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov] On Behalf Of Steve Mussman
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:41 AM
To: coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
Subject: [Coral-List] Shark Feeding Question
It seems to me that there is a clear understanding that in general feeding
animals in the wild is considered bad form.
That said, why is it that shark feedings and the growing popularity of
staged shark interactions seem to be viewed as (almost) being sanctioned by
a number of papers that conclude that there is no evidence that provisioning
has any measureable (detrimental) impacts on the sharks involved, adjacent
communities and ecosystems? In fact it is often suggested that long-term
monitoring of sharks and other marine life at provisioning sites will
likely provide much needed temporal data that will benefit apex-predator
conservation efforts and protected area management strategies.
Are we therefore wrong to simply assume that in general feeding animals (and
physically interacting in such ways) in the wild is to be discouraged? Are
aquatic animal interactions somehow innately different from terrestrial
encounters? Is it best to only make species-specific assumptions on the
appropriateness of such activities? For example, is food provisioning
(following accepted protocols in areas where it is allowed) somehow
considered acceptable for sharks, but not for other marine animals?
Finally, I have found a few papers on the impacts of provisioning on sharks,
but none on other aquatic species. Can anyone direct me to additional
studies that could help shed some light on the broader issues involved?
Thanks,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
More information about the Coral-List
mailing list