[Coral-List] The Four Principles of Ecological Restoration
Day Rusty
rusty.day at manta-online.org
Wed Aug 15 13:20:48 UTC 2018
Hi Sarah,
This certainly seems useful. If you can't articulate your plan and measures
of success, it might mean you don't have much of a plan....and are unlikely
to succeed.
One thing that seems conspicuously absent from item # 1 is fish biomass.
Fish biomass may not be a prerequisite for a healthy reef (or coral). And
you may have lots of some fish taxa where there aren't many corals.
Nevertheless, fish biomass is certainly symptomatic of a healthy coral reef
ecosystem. It's been a primary success measure for MPAs (which granted, are
focused on fishery exclusion).
Do you think was this not included in on an ecological basis (e.g. it's not
a good metric compared to complexity)? Or on a more political/practical
basis (e.g. we don't want fishermen and managers to equate restoration with
fishing prohibition).
Cheers,
Rusty
On August 13, 2018 at 11:34 AM Sarah Frias-Torres
<[1]sfrias_torres at hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Coral Listers
Recently, I have come upon several ill-planned coral reef restoration
projects that failed. I also see newspaper interpretations on other
projects that are blown out of proportion.
We must bring the coral reef restoration community together and implement
a set of basic principles to guide present and future projects.
Coral reef restoration must follow the four basic principles of planning
and implementation of ecological restoration in order to increase
sustainable and valuable outcomes. These principles are explained in
Suding et al. (2015). Below, I list the four basic principles and a direct
implication for coral reef restoration labelled as CRR:
1. Restoration increases ecological integrity. Restoration initiates or
accelerates recovery of degraded areas by prioritizing the complexity of
biological assemblages, including species composition and representation
of all functional groups, as well as the features and processes needed
to sustain these biota and to support ecosystem function;
[CRR] Avoid "monocultures" unless they exist in natural conditions (i.e.
Acropora thickets); aim to restore species assemblages
2. Restoration is sustainable in the long term. Restoration aims to
establish systems that are self-sustaining and resilient; thus, they
must be consistent with their environmental context and landscape
setting. Once a restoration project is complete, the goal should be to
minimize human intervention over the long term. When intervention is
required, it should be to simulate natural processes that the landscape
no longer provides or to support traditional practices of local
communities;
[CRR] coral reef restoration jump-starts a degraded coral reef that is
beyond natural recovery. Once the intervention ends, it must be
self-sustaining, i.e. the restored reef attracts new coral recruits, fish
community increases, etc.
3. Restoration is informed by the past and future. Historical knowledge, in
its many forms, can indicate how ecosystems functioned in the past and
can provide references for identifying potential future trajectories and
measuring functional and compositional success of projects. However, the
unprecedented pace and spatial extent of anthropogenic changes in the
present era can create conditions that depart strongly from historical
trends. Often, then, history serves less as a template and more as a
guide for determining appropriate restoration goals.
[CRR] this is shorthand for "don't "restore" a coral reef where there was
not one to begin with.
4. Restoration benefits and engages society. Restoration focuses on
recovering biodiversity and supporting the intrinsic value of nature. It
also provides a suite of ecosystem services (e.g., improved water
quality, fertile and stable soils, drought and flood buffering, genetic
diversity, and carbon sequestration) that enhance human quality of life
(e.g., clean water, food security, enhanced health, and effective
governance). Restoration engages people through direct participation
and, thus, increases understanding of ecosystems and their benefits and
strengthens human communities.
[CRR] Meaning, don't do "helicopter science". Involve the local community
as much as possible throughout the entire process.
I would add a communications principle:
5. Do not over-promise on what your project can do. Be very clear on what
you are doing. A coral is not a coral is not a coral. It's not the same
to outplant one breeding sized branching coral (i.e. 20 cm diameter), 20
thumb-sized fragment or 200 coral spat (< 1 cm diameter). Each coral is
a at a different growth stage, has different mortality rates and
different outcomes for the project. Educate journalists on the correct
way of reporting your project. I know many won't listen, but it's worth
the effort for those who would listen.
Reference
Suding K. and 12 authors (2015) Committing to ecological restoration .
Science 348: 638-640
[2]http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6235/638
<><...<><...<><...
Sarah Frias-Torres, Ph.D.
Twitter: @GrouperDoc
Science Blog: [3]https://grouperluna.com/
Art Blog: [4]https://oceanbestiary.com/
_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
[5]Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
[6]http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
References
1. mailto:sfrias_torres at hotmail.com
2. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6235/638
3. https://grouperluna.com/
4. https://oceanbestiary.com/
5. mailto:Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
6. http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
More information about the Coral-List
mailing list