[Coral-List] SPAM R2: Re: The Four Principles of Ecological Restoration

Shark shortfin_mako_shark at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 21 18:05:52 UTC 2018


Sarah:

Good to hear about this new journal. I always found it a little odd that
journals would only primary publish research with statistical tests that
showed statistical significance. We can learn a lot.. if not more, about
research and associated data that do not show significance.

In terms of your reporting. To be fair, it will be important to have some
type of context to the research. Methods are usually only as good as the
conditions. In other words, if water quality is poor.. it is unlikely the
best methods will work to restore any area. In contrast, even the worse
handling conditions or methods might work in area that has the best
environmental conditions. 

Obviously, certain species are better than others as well. 

Juan

-----Original Message-----
From: Coral-List [mailto:coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov] On Behalf
Of Sarah Frias-Torres
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 1:21 PM
To: Julian <julian at reefcheck.org.my>; 'Robert Nowicki' <rnowicki at mote.org>;
'Damien Beri' <beridl at g.cofc.edu>
Cc: 'coral list' <coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov>
Subject: Re: [Coral-List] SPAM R2: Re: The Four Principles of Ecological
Restoration

Dear all,

thanks for the feedback so far.


If we have non significant results (the null hypothesis not rejected) we can
send manuscripts to the new Journal of Negative Results in Ecology and
Evolutionary Biology

http://www.jnr-eeb.org/index.php/jnr


As for reporting coral reef restoration projects that failed, I'm balancing
the lack of protection to the messenger with the need of the scientific and
implementation community to know what doesn't work so money is not wasted.
The solution, as suggested by others, is to report methods that failed
without reporting specific names. This approach is now in the pipeline and
I'll share in Coral-List the moment the information is available


<><...<><...<><...

Sarah Frias-Torres, Ph.D.
Twitter: @GrouperDoc
Science Blog: https://grouperluna.com/
Art Blog: https://oceanbestiary.com/



________________________________
From: Coral-List <coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov> on behalf of
Julian <julian at reefcheck.org.my>
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 10:33 PM
To: 'Robert Nowicki'; 'Damien Beri'
Cc: 'coral list'
Subject: Re: [Coral-List] SPAM R2: Re: The Four Principles of Ecological
Restoration

Hi to all
Our own small scale restoration experiments since 2011 are detailed in a
booklet we published recently (available for download soon on our website
www.reefcheck.org.my<http://www.reefcheck.org.my>) which deliberately
includes what didn't work so that others can learn from it and not waste
more money trying something that won't work. It seems uncommon to publish
such "negative" results - I sometimes wonder how much useful information is
sitting in scientists minds...but never gets published because it was a
"failed" experiment.
Regards,

Julian Hyde
General Manager
Reef Check Malaysia
+60 3 2161 5948
www.reefcheck.org.my<http://www.reefcheck.org.my>
Follow us on Facebook at
www.facebook.com/rcmalaysia<http://www.facebook.com/rcmalaysia>

Heard a fish bomb? E-mail us at reportfishbomb at reefcheck.org.my with date,
time and location




-----Original Message-----
From: Coral-List <coral-list-bounces at coral.aoml.noaa.gov> On Behalf Of
Robert Nowicki
Sent: Friday, 17 August, 2018 11:33 PM
To: Damien Beri <beridl at g.cofc.edu>
Cc: coral list <coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov>
Subject: SPAM R2: Re: [Coral-List] The Four Principles of Ecological
Restoration

Hi all,

I agree that it would benefit the scientific community to highlight what
doesn't work- especially given the well understood publishing bias towards
positive (i.e. significant) results.  Best restoration practices include
what *not *to do, and with coral restoration funding so tight, every grant
not spent pursuing a known dead end is a grant that can be used to pursue
new directions.  Learning what methods don't succeed is still valuable work
and should be celebrated as such.

Generally, if people are afraid of "outing" organizations or people, perhaps
an alternative would be to list methods that failed, or non-methodological
drivers of failure (such as logistical, biological, or political
challenges)?  That way restoration groups can know what to watch out for or
what not to pursue without people getting thrown into the spotlight.

Curious what everyone else thinks.


Dr. Rob Nowicki

Postdoctoral Research Fellow
Elizabeth Moore International Center for Coral Reef Research & Restoration
Mote Marine Laboratory
24244 Overseas Highway
Summerland Key, FL 33042

Office phone: (941)-504-4812


On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:29 PM, Damien Beri <beridl at g.cofc.edu> wrote:

> Dear Dr. Frias-Torres,
>
> Making mistakes and learning from them is part of science.  While you 
> are under no obligation to share your findings I believe it would help 
> the community to understand what went wrong and why. There's nothing 
> wrong with a failed restoration project in my eyes because coral 
> restoration is probably the most complex form of environmental 
> restoration occurring.  I don't want to alienate, that's a personal
opinion, I want to learn.
>
> Coming from a position of raising money to donate to coral-restoration 
> it would be nice to know some of these details to better make 
> donations. Who knows, maybe some of the money we donated went to such 
> organizations, I doubt it, but being so far away it can be hard to tell.
>
> Warm Regards,
> Damien Beri
>
> Founder
> Reefined Arts
>
>
> B.S. Biology
> The college of Charleston
> Coral/Aquarium Specialist
>
>
>
> > On Aug 14, 2018, at 5:19 PM, Sarah Frias-Torres <
> sfrias_torres at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Damien,
> > Indeed, I would like very much to share openly in Coral-List the 
> > coral
> reef restoration projects that failed because a solid scientific base 
> was missing.
> > However, this would be sensitive information (with names and dates) 
> > and
> it will alienate the organizations that funded and/or implemented the
work.
> >
> > Rather than alienating them pointing out they failed, I think it's
> better to build a strong science-based coral reef restoration 
> community of scientists and practitioners, and we make our code of 
> conduct and our application of basic principles of ecological 
> restoration well known, and we publicize them through all media available,
globally.
> >
> > I prefer building bridges than pointing fingers... but I keep a 
> > little
> black book with project fails just in case more drastic measures are
needed.
> >
> >
> > <><...<><...<><...
> >
> > Sarah Frias-Torres, Ph.D.
> > Twitter: @GrouperDoc
> > Science Blog: https://grouperluna.com/ Art Blog:
> > https://oceanbestiary.com/
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Damien Beri <beridl at g.cofc.edu>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 5:03 PM
> > To: Sarah Frias-Torres
> > Cc: coral list
> > Subject: Re: [Coral-List] The Four Principles of Ecological 
> > Restoration
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you for sharing these 4 basic principles. Could you please 
> > share
> these failed restoration projects you have come across?
> >
> > Warm Regards,
> > Damien Beri
> >
> > M.A Marine Conservation and Policy
> > Stony Brook University
> >
> > B.S. Biology
> > The college of Charleston
> > Coral/Aquarium Specialist
> >
> > > On Aug 13, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Sarah Frias-Torres <
> sfrias_torres at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Dear Coral Listers
> > >
> > > Recently, I have come upon several ill-planned coral reef 
> > > restoration
> projects that failed. I also see newspaper interpretations on other 
> projects that are blown out of proportion.
> > >
> > >
> > > We must bring the coral reef restoration community together and
> implement a set of basic principles to guide present and future projects.
> > >
> > >
> > > Coral reef restoration must follow the four basic principles of
> planning and implementation of ecological restoration in order to 
> increase sustainable and valuable outcomes. These principles are 
> explained in Suding et al. (2015). Below, I list the four basic 
> principles and a direct implication for coral reef restoration labelled as
CRR:
> > >
> > > 1. Restoration increases ecological integrity. Restoration 
> > > initiates
> or accelerates recovery of degraded areas by prioritizing the 
> complexity of biological assemblages, including species composition 
> and representation of all functional groups, as well as the features 
> and processes needed to sustain these biota and to support ecosystem 
> function;
> > >
> > > [CRR] Avoid "monocultures" unless they exist in natural conditions
> (i.e. Acropora thickets);  aim to restore species assemblages
> > >
> > > 2. Restoration is sustainable in the long term. Restoration aims 
> > > to
> establish systems that are self-sustaining and resilient; thus, they 
> must be consistent with their environmental context and landscape 
> setting. Once a restoration project is complete, the goal should be to 
> minimize human intervention over the long term. When intervention is 
> required, it should be to simulate natural processes that the 
> landscape no longer provides or to support traditional practices of 
> local communities;
> > >
> > > [CRR] coral reef restoration jump-starts a degraded coral reef 
> > > that is
> beyond natural recovery. Once the intervention ends, it must be 
> self-sustaining, i.e. the restored reef attracts new coral recruits, 
> fish community increases, etc.
> > >
> > > 3. Restoration is informed by the past and future. Historical
> knowledge, in its many forms, can indicate how ecosystems functioned 
> in the past and can provide references for identifying potential 
> future trajectories and measuring functional and compositional success 
> of projects. However, the unprecedented pace and spatial extent of 
> anthropogenic changes in the present era can create conditions that 
> depart strongly from historical trends. Often, then, history serves 
> less as a template and more as a guide for determining appropriate
restoration goals.
> > >
> > > [CRR] this is shorthand for "don't "restore" a coral reef where 
> > > there
> was not one to begin with.
> > >
> > > 4. Restoration benefits and engages society. Restoration focuses 
> > > on
> recovering biodiversity and supporting the intrinsic value of nature.
> It also provides a suite of ecosystem services (e.g., improved water 
> quality, fertile and stable soils, drought and flood buffering, 
> genetic diversity, and carbon sequestration) that enhance human 
> quality of life (e.g., clean water, food security, enhanced health, and
effective governance).
> Restoration engages people through direct participation and, thus, 
> increases understanding of ecosystems and their benefits and 
> strengthens human communities.
> > >
> > > [CRR] Meaning, don't do "helicopter science". Involve the local
> community as much as possible throughout the entire process.
> > >
> > > I would add a communications principle:
> > >
> > > 5. Do not over-promise on what your project can do. Be very clear 
> > > on
> what you are doing. A coral is not a coral is not a coral. It's not 
> the same to outplant one breeding sized branching coral (i.e. 20 cm 
> diameter),
> 20 thumb-sized fragment or 200 coral spat (< 1 cm diameter). Each 
> coral is a at a different growth stage, has different mortality rates 
> and different outcomes for the project. Educate journalists on the 
> correct way of reporting your project. I know many won't listen, but 
> it's worth the effort for those who would listen.
> > >
> > >
> > > Reference
> > >
> > > Suding K. and 12 authors (2015) Committing to ecological restoration .
> Science 348: 638-640
> > >
> > > http://science.sciencemag.org/content/348/6235/638
> >
> > Committing to ecological restoration | Science 
> > science.sciencemag.org At the September 2014 United Nations Climate 
> > Summit, governments rallied
> around an international agreement-the New York Declaration on 
> Forests-that underscored restoration of degraded ecosystems as an 
> auspicious solution to climate change.
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > <><...<><...<><...
> > >
> > > Sarah Frias-Torres, Ph.D.
> > > Twitter: @GrouperDoc
> > > Science Blog: https://grouperluna.com/ Art Blog:
> > > https://oceanbestiary.com/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Coral-List mailing list
> > > Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
> > > http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
> _______________________________________________
> Coral-List mailing list
> Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
> http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list


_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list
_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



More information about the Coral-List mailing list