[Coral-List] NOAA plan to save coral reefs

Tue Dec 24 11:45:51 UTC 2019

Hey All,
As we begin about 50 years of coral reef conservation I offer the following
to this august group:
 Insanity is described as doing the same thing over and over expecting a
different result.
We knew the drivers of coral reef destruction a long time ago, although it
doesn't seem that long ago.
Reefs are the messengers.
We are the bad guys but no one wants to step up.
No government has the political will.
No government agencies can really make a difference until there is will -
or emergency
Human reproductive success is driving the destruction of our only biosphere.
So work at local levels where you think you can make a difference.
Attack the fundamental mechanisms ,not the diversions.
Mother Nature will take care of the rest.........including us.
Then maybe there will be Peace on Earth.
P

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 1:42 AM Steve Mussman via Coral-List <
coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov> wrote:

> Hi Steven,
>
> I just don’t understand why the effort in Florida doesn’t have the
> following essential aspects of restoration front and center.
>
> From : Rodgers et al. (2017), Effectiveness of coral relocation as a
> mitigation strategy in
> Ka ̄ne‘ohe Bay, Hawai‘i.
>
> “Coral restoration projects are better designed and implemented today than
> decades ago, but they may take the focus off the underlying problems. We
> need to reduce pollution, prevent erosion, and reduce carbon emissions.
> Restoration efforts on reefs vulnerable to poor land management, pollution,
> and/or continued severe bleaching may render restoration efforts futile”.
>
> “Effective translocation and management plans should include reduction or
> elimination of watershed stressors, establishment of marine reserves,
> development of integrated coastal management systems, and establishment and
> enforcement of regulations that protect coral reefs”.
>
>
>  The idea that addressing major stressors is paramount to the long-term
> success of any such project appears to be based on sound science.
> Conversely, any large-scale project that does not put emphasis on the
> underlying problems is setting itself up for criticism to say nothing of
> increasing the odds of ultimate failure. Restoration is not inherently
> folly in any sense, but if it by design takes the focus off major stressors
> E.g. water quality and climate change, then it’s setting itself up for an
> inauspicious ending.
>
> There are reasons to support well-conceived restoration projects, but they
> should be framed as a tool, not a solution. If the hype surrounding these
> efforts even unintentionally delays action on addressing the major
> stressors one could certainly argue that they may be  doing more harm than
> good.
>
> Regards,
> Steve Mussman
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On Dec 20, 2019, at 5:50 PM, Steven Miller via Coral-List <
> coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov> wrote:
> >
> > A quick reply to counter the idea that restoration is folly, even though
> > I'm a co-author on an older restoration paper with folly in the title. I
> > changed my mind. I wonder how many people on the list have changed their
> > minds, moving from one camp to another, or abandoned belief in a paradigm
> > for something that they thought was better?  That would be an interesting
> > thread, but I digress.
> >
> > Why should anyone support coral restoration when all the stressors remain
> > that got us to where we are now, and related to warming are only getting
> > worse?
> >
> > Simply, 1)  Large numbers (tens of thousands) of corals in offshore
> > nurseries (mid Hawk Channel in Florida) grow fast and are generally in
> good
> > shape after a year or two. 2) Corals in nurseries were derived from
> > survivors. That is, from wild corals that survived multiple bleaching and
> > disease events. 3) Nursery corals also represent a genetically diverse
> > population, based on individuals collected across significant spatial
> > scales and genetic analyses that confirm the diversity of corals in
> > nurseries capture a significant portion of variability that exists in the
> > wild. 5) Large numbers of nursery-raised corals can be outplanted to
> reefs
> > and despite high mortality after 5-10 years, some corals survive.
> >
> > So, a result of restoration work (not projects but large-scale programs)
> > that can be sustained at the decadal scale is lots of corals (potentially
> > thousands) on reefs where they were previously absent. Local ecological
> > extinction is prevented. Even better, outplanted corals have sex and
> while
> > the fate of their gametes is unknown, as more adults survive on the reef,
> > perhaps recruitment will eventually result.
> >
> > But challenges remain, such as how to get more corals out to reefs in a
> > cost-efficient manner.  Some species present unique challenges, I know.
> > And more.
> >
> > The above summary is based on work from Florida, which perhaps represents
> > the most challenging place to try and conduct this work. After all,
> > historical baselines suggest that the best reefs were limited to only a
> > small percentage of total available habitat, due to things like outflow
> > from Florida Bay and the northern geographic limit of reef growth in the
> > region being just south of Miami.
> >
> > My intent with this post is to suggest that there are reasons to support
> > restoration despite the criticism of why do it in the face of existing
> > stressors.  If you don't think it will work, then, by all means,
> critiques
> > are warranted that advance the science. But understand that successes
> have
> > already occurred that suggest those who are working on restoration are
> not
> > doing so in folly.
> >
> > Finally, coral restoration science is in its infancy.  In my opinion,
> it's
> > way too early to give up.
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> > Steven Miller. PhD
> > Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography
> > Nova Southeastern University
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:45 PM Risk, Michael via Coral-List <
> > coral-list at coral.aoml.noaa.gov> wrote:
> >
> >> The entire article doesn't even mention LBSP. It's as though Brian
> >> Lapointe's work had been airbrushed away...we never learn, do we?
> >> ________________________________________
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> Coral-List mailing list
> Coral-List at coral.aoml.noaa.gov
> https://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list

-- 

Phillip Dustan PhD
Charleston SC  29424
843-953-8086 office
843-224-3321 (mobile)

"When we try to pick out anything by itself
we find that it is bound fast by a thousand invisible cords
that cannot be broken, to everything in the universe. "
*                                         John Muir 1869*

*Bali Coral Bleaching 2016 video*

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxOfLTnPSUo
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxOfLTnPSUo>*
TEDx Charleston on saving coral reefs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwENBNrfKj4
Google Scholar Citations:
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=HCwfXZ0AAAAJ